Suppose a man dies with a second wife, but with the children of his first wife. His will leaves everything to his children. The second woman claims a one-year family allowance and the right to live until her death in the man`s spacious and precious house. She has that right, according to Texas law. But she`s not really happy because she knows she can`t afford to continue living at home and would rather settle near her own children, but if she did, she wouldn`t have a place to live. The children are not happy because the house is the most valuable property of the property, and they want to sell it now. Enter the family billing contract. Children and the woman can sit down and agree that instead of family allowances and property, the woman can receive an estate pension that would allow her to have a modest home close to her own children. Children can now sell the house, use part of the proceeds to buy the pension and distribute the entire property. If the corresponding requirements of the law are met, the agreement will be legally applicable under the Indian Estate Act of 1925. Under Texas law, the lesson to be learned from family settlement includes three fundamental principles: the right of the crook to make a will decision, the right of beneficiaries to pass on their rights, and the balancing of these competing rights by requiring agreement on an alternative distribution plan. Family comparison cases in Texas support the conclusion that the family comparison doctrine is generally applicable when there is disagreement over the distribution of an estate and the beneficiaries reach an agreement to settle their dispute.
If you have a drug-addicted heir, for example, but who lives in his great aunt`s house and is not willing to do anything that would sell the house, the other 19 heirs cannot get together without him and sign a family comparison contract. Instead, you will most likely end up with a dependent administration, where the judge may or may not allow you to take repayments to make urgent repairs before putting the house up for sale, at a price that must first be approved by the judge, and in the meantime, you need a loan, and need a formal assessment, and have to submit accounts and . . You`re the one with the idea. All for lack of signature of a forgery with a share of 1/32 of the estate. According to this doctrine, beneficiaries may, under a will, enter into an agreement, not bury a will and share the estate`s estate in an alternative manner provided by the will. A family comparison contract generally requires that all beneficiaries of a will be included in the agreement. One of the most popular uses of family comparison agreements is in situations where someone challenges the will in court.